Are networks/complexity the future of policymaking? (RSA event report)

Blog 1 Comments

  • Communities
  • Social networks

‘21st Century Policy Development - how networks and complex systems can inform policymaking in the UK' was the focus of what was, for me, a fascinating conference - jointly organised by the RSA - which attracted an audience of 200 Fellows and others to Westminster Central Hall.

Paul Ormerod

Paul Ormerod © Zarina Holmes / Synthesis ISP

The first speaker at the event was Paul Ormerod FRSA, author of the 2010 RSA pamphlet N Squared - Public policy and the power of networks.

"The idea of complexity is about much subtler and much cleverer government,’ explained Paul.

“The science of networks has advanced enormously in last 10-15 years"

If we knew how to do it, we wouldn't bother to hold this meeting

- Paul Ormerod

- but only recently have we known enough to begin to translate it into policy, for example working with the “positive knowledge that local communities have to revive themselves”.

However he candidly admitted, "if we knew how to do it, we wouldn't bother to hold this meeting".

Steve Broome

RSA Director of Research Steve Broome explained during his session: “if we have some idea of the network structure then we have a better chance of seeding interventions in those places that will enable network effects?”

He drew on examples including the pioneering drug recovery work the RSA is beginning at scale in West Kent and the mapping of local relationships in Blackburn, "to tap into the hidden wealth in communities… that can be encouraged to be more co-productive".

“At the heart of the networks are active parents at the school gates, the quiz-master at the local pub,” said Steve.

Another RSA project mapped social networks in New Cross Gate in London: aiming to "bring local latent change-makers together".

"There is a role for a new kind of public servant: a network weaver, an enabler", said Steve.

There is a role for a new kind of public servant: a network weaver, an enabler

- Steve Broome

He also shared that: “complexity is difficult, it can give you a complex - in some ways I feel less capable and knowledgeable than I used to, but I feel more confident in my reduced sense of capability being more effective."

The organiser of the event, Greg Fisher FRSA, co-founder of the think-tank Synthesis with Paul Ormerod and Bridget Rosewell, feels the approach is very much part of the RSA’s ‘21st Century Enlightenment’: “The most poignant moment for me was during the breakfast seminar in Parliament when Jeff Johnson, Professor of Complexity Science and Design at the Open University, emphasised that the world is currently undergoing a scientific revolution. For me, the shift underway, which was very much catalysed by the computer revolution, is equivalent to the Enlightenment of the 18th and 19th Century.”

“Curiously, this chimes with the RSA's tagline of ‘21st Century Enlightenment’. This revolution is not confined to the natural sciences because it involves an improved understanding of systems we call ‘complex’ (those with lots of constituent parts that interact with and adapt to each other), which includes human systems. Computer power gives us the ability to model such systems much better than we did before.”

©Zarina Holmes/Synthesis ISP

The key role being played by the RSA seems very appropriate: “One of the most poetic aspects of the day for me was the co-hosting of the event by the RSA and Synthesis. Synthesis recently emerged during what I think is a new Enlightenment, while the RSA, the grandfather of think-tanks, emerged during the first Enlightenment." 

it's great that the infusion of this new thinking into policy is being led by one of the oldest and one of the newest think tanks

- Greg Fisher, Synthesis

“So it's great that the infusion of this new thinking into policy is being led by one of the oldest and one of the newest think tanks. It was good to see a number of RSA Fellows there (in addition to me and Paul Ormerod!), including a number of Fellows from the Living Systems Group” (which was founded in 1994 by Eileen Conn MBE FRSA - and has involved around 100 Fellows since its launch).

“Finally, one of the points I struggled to get across during the day was that a networks and complexity take on human systems will not get us to some modelling nirvana when we have a perfect understanding of people and society,” said Greg.

“We're moving a step in the right direction but one of the lessons that emerges from this thinking is that we should be humble in the face of the complexity of the world around us. We will never have a perfect understanding but this new thinking does lead us to understand things better i.e. it's a step in the right direction.”

Links

 

Matthew Mezey is a former RSA Senior Networks Manager – Online & International. Twitter: @MatthewMezey. A live dashboard webpage showing RSA online activity is here.

 

 

Join the discussion

1 Comments

Please login to post a comment or reply

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

  • Greg is so right – complex systems thinking is not a nirvana where the truth is suddenly revealed, through modeling or any other technique. I have been interested for a very long time in looking at our human social systems as ‘living systems’, a way of taking complexity ideas and applying them specifically to our human way of organising. This gives us a new lens to look at how we do things, and insights into how we can do things differently. Then all kinds of current road blocks and dead ends can disappear into the mist. Of course other blocks will appear as is the way of complex systems – they are dynamic and ever changing. But repeating the same old road blocks is such a waste of time. I have been working, for many years, with this other complex living system lens in place in the world of local community dynamics http://twitter.com/PeckhamVisi... For some theoretical insights from all that see here http://goo.gl/jVXKT

Related articles