Yesterday's post was self indulgent and silly (not to mention giving 'OldAndrew' an open goal). To have something different on my homepage, I am posting from my mini break in France.
I am looking for thoughts on a question which is at the front of my mind right now: what are the best conditions for small groups of people to develop good ideas and (the ' and' is very important) commit to taking the ideas forward.
A few suggestions to get us going:
1. A group incentive is good but it should not be so large that it distracts (see Dan Pink's world beating Animate) or introduces perverse incentives.
2. Apparently, according to some research I plan to look into properly next week, 12 is the optimum group size to develop ideas (strikes me as a bit big).
3. There needs to be clear norms - or even explicit rules - which stop the people with the loudest voices or strongest opinions from dominating.
4. Like the incentive, the focus should be medium sized - not so wide that the conversation lacks a thread, not so narrow to stifle imagination.
There's four to be going on with - over to you dear readers ...
Related articles
-
Open RSA knowledge standards
Alessandra Tombazzi Tom Kenyon
After investigating ‘knowledge commons’, we're introducing our open RSA standards and what they mean for our practice, products and processes.
-
RSA Catalyst Awards 2023: winners announced
Alexandra Brown
Learn about the 11 exciting innovation projects receiving RSA Catalyst funding in our 2023 awards.
-
Investment for inclusive and sustainable growth in cities
Anna Valero
Anna Valero highlights a decisive decade for addressing the UK’s longstanding productivity problems, large and persistent inequalities across and within regions, and delivering on net zero commitments.
Be the first to write a comment
Comments
Please login to post a comment or reply
Don't have an account? Click here to register.